Wolf v. Yamin’s Empirical Analysis
295 F.3d 303 · 2002
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2025
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Berry v. Loiseau · Vandersluis v. Weil · Alaimo v. Royer · Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co. · Appliances, Inc. v. Yost
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether the jury instructions were proper and whether [the party]'s objection to those instructions was timely are irrelevant to the question whether [opposing party] sustained his burden of proof by presenting evidence on each element of his claim”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“challenged not the substance of the instructions on punitive damages but the sufficiency of the evidence supporting such an award,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.