Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 F.3d 701 - Martin v. Shawano-Gresham School District

Martin v. Shawano-Gresham School District’s Empirical Analysis

295 F.3d 701 · 2002

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2021 · most notably Sanford ex rel. Estate of Sanford v. Stiles (2006), Doe 1-7 v. Heck (2003)

18 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

380200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Santosky v. Kramer · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, and Melody Deshaney,s v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, et al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the failure to conform with the procedural requirements guaranteed by state law does not by itself constitute a violation of federal due process”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “denial of state procedures in and of itself does not create inadequate process under the federal constitution”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the process provided need consist only of `oral or written notice of the charges against [the student] and, if he denies them, an explanation of the evidence the authorities have and an opportunity [for the student] to present his side of the story'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.