Clark v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
295 F.3d 809 · 2002
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on General Electric Co. v. Joiner · Old Chief v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · California Department of Transportation v. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of California · Westcott v. City of Omaha
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Federal Rule of Evidence 403 provides: The court may exclude relevant 2 evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review a district court's decision to grant or refuse amendments to conform the pleadings to the evidence for an abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.