Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 FSUPP3D 496 - Oberdorf v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

Oberdorf v. Amazon.Com, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 47 U.S.C. § 230 (Communications Decency Act § 230)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Webb v. Zern · Phillips v. A-Best Products Co. · Musser v. Vilsmeier Auction Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.