Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 KAN 605 - State v. Wilson

State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Cunningham v. California · State v. Ward · State v. Ivory · State v. King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[S]uch evidence is admissible when relevant to prove some other material fact including motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity or absence of mistake or accident.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'the evidence should disclose sufficient facts and circumstances of the offense to raise a reasonable inference that the defendant committed 21 both offenses.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the seven uncharged burglaries met the probativity element of relevance to prove the disputed material fact of identity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.