Howlett v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Maus v. State (1987), Chase v. State (1987)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Texas v. Louisiana · 59 Ill. 2d 220 - People v. Beard · United States v. Segal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(b) Express Waiver of Counsel.—If a defendant who is not represented by counsel indicates a desire to waive counsel, the court may not accept the waiver until it determines, after an examination of the defendant on the record conducted by the court, the State’s Attorney, or both, that the defendant is knowingly and voluntarily waiving the right to counsel____””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Flansburg“While a probation revocation proceeding relates directly to the criminal case of the substantive offense, the proceeding is not itself a new criminal prosecution; the commission of a crime is not charged and the alleged violation of probation, if established, is not punishable beyond the reimposition of the original sentence imposed. Id. at 424 , 456 A.2d 375 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Chase v. State“not applicable in a probation revocation hearing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Finney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.