Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 Mich. 669 - Emery v. Tant

Emery v. Tant’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 1942
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Campau v. Godfrey · Ashbaugh v. Sauer · Detroit & Security Trust Co. v. Gitre · Jensen v. Oceana Circuit Judge · Haight v. Reynolds

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The usual and proper method of attacking a levy is by motion to quash it in the court under whose writ it is made, where such course will furnish adequate relief (2 Freeman on Executions [3d Ed.], § 271a), and along the same line it was held in Campau v. Godfrey, 18 Mich. 27 ( 100 Am. Dec. 133 ), that one who complains of a levy upon his property should move for relief in the court which issued the execution rather than by a bill in equity.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.