State Ex Rel. Preiss v. Seibel’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 1954
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carlisle v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. · State ex rel. Woody v. Rotwitt · State ex rel. Punch v. Kortjohn · State ex rel. Metcalf v. Johnson · Baker v. Board of Election Commissioners
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In ease such objection is made, notice thereof shall forthwith be mailed to all candidates who may be affected thereby . . . The secretary of state or the county clerk, [or a board of election commissioners], as the case may be, with whom the original certificate was filed, shall in the first instance pass upon the validity of such objection and his decision shall be final, unless . . . ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nagel v. Barrett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.