Windham v. Griffin’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
32 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Watkins v. Nelson · In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Julian Clifford JANES, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0258635 · Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom · Stuhr v. Stuhr · Jones v. Barlow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We continue to adhere to the view that the parental preference doctrine, by definition, is a preference, and it will be applied to a child custody determination unless it is shown that the lawful parent is unfit or has forfeited his or her superior right or the preference is negated by a demonstration that the best interests of the child lie elsewhere.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]hile preference must be given to a biological or adoptive parent's superior right to custody where the parent is not unfit and has not forfeited his or her parental rights, a court also considers the child's best interests in making its custody determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“examine the merits as though [the parent and nonparent] were standing on equal footing and the outcome would be determined only by reference to best interests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.