295 N.J. Super. 186 - Hofstrom v. Share’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lanzet v. Greenberg · Ostrowski v. Azzara · Schueler v. Strelinger · Johansen v. Makita U.S.A., Inc. · Walck v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here an attorney persists in making unwarranted prejudicial appeals to a jury which taint the verdict .... we have often held that a reversal is in order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.