Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 N.W.2d 5 - State v. Bennett

State v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
December 2004
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2004

4 state decisions

30198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Payton v. New York · Drew v. United States · Baker v. United States · United States v. Reed · People v. Barker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the offense for which defendant was sought was certainly not trivial, in view of the substantial period of time that elapsed between the date of the offense [July 19, 1976] and the date of the arrest [October 20, 1976], it can hardly be said that the charge of distributing a controlled substance was a grave offense in the sense that immediate action was necessary to apprehend the perpetrator.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.