Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 NW2D 527 - State v. Adams

State v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably State v. Loebach (1981), State v. Ford (1995)

58 state decisions

2901980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. People of State of New York · Gardner v. Florida · Sansone v. United States · Specht v. Patterson · United States v. Bishop

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the accused testified, the inadequacies and admissions in his testimony may be corroborative of the accomplice’s testimony. Corroborating evidence may be secured from the defendant’s association with those involved in the crime in such a way as to suggest joint participation, as well as from the defendant’s opportunity and motive to commit the crime * * *.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice, unless it is corroborated by such other evidence as tends to convict the defendant of the commission of the offense, and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense or the circumstances thereof.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Whoever * * * intentionally causes the death of another person in the heat of passion provided by such words or acts of another as would provoke a person of ordinary self-control under like circumstances * * * [is guilty of manslaughter in the first degree].”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.