State v. Farber’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
July 1993
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“made in order to gain an advantage, as when a person in custody makes an admission as part of a plea bargain, or makes a statement after a crime is committed to lay the blame on someone else, or at least implicate him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Nielsen“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right * * * to meet the witnesses face to face[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Hancock“some hearsay statements are admissible, even in light of the confrontation clause”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hancock
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.