Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 P2D 1061 - Cox v. Kelley

Cox v. Kelley’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
July 1980
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1980

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

601956196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Francis · McGrath v. Eichoff · Williams v. Bailey · Woods v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Collier v. Bartlett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * The law does not attempt to list all of the acts of dominion which may constitute such possession, so that what constitutes adverse possession, like the question of what constitutes negligence, often depends upon the circumstances of the particular case, as measured by the judgment of reasonable men. It has been said that such a determination in a given case must largely depend upon `the situation of the parties, the size and extent of the land, and the purpose for which it is adapted.'"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"A deed to real property by a grantor out of possession who has not been in possession for a year next preceding date of conveyance, or has not within a year taken rents and profits, or those under whom he claims, is void as against any person or persons in adverse possession."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “' “Where evidence in case of equitable cognizance is conflicting, trial court’s finding thereon will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly against the weight thereof.” Mayer v. Pettigrew, Okl., 272 P.2d 411 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.