Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 P2D 814 - Application of Eckert

Application of Eckert’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1962
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 86 Okla. Crim. 364 - State Ex Rel. Burford v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Functions of writ of error coram nobis are limited to an error of fact for which statute provides no other remedy, which fact does not appear of record or is unknown to court when judgment is pronounced, and which, if known, would have prevented the judgment and also which is unknown and could not have been known to the party by exercise of reasonable diligence in time to have been otherwise presented to court, or which the party is prevented from presenting by duress, fear or other sufficient cause. 20 O.S. 1951 §§ 40, 41; 22 O.S. 1951 § 9. "Writ of error coram nobis will reach only matters not cognizable on motion for new trial, or in arrest of judgment, or on appeal."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.