Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 Pa. 264 - Commonwealth v. Quaranta

Commonwealth v. Quaranta’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

119
cited by 119 later decisions
7
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 103 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 119 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Commonwealth v. Bighum (1973), Bracey v. United States (1944)

7 federal appellate · 103 state decisions

2501928193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Garland · Knote v. United States · Commonwealth v. Colandro · Commonwealth v. Marshall · Commonwealth v. Racco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 119 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But every offense or crime under the law is not relevant to prove one’s character for veracity, and, as it is not permissible to show a general bad character because of the abuse that could be made of it by the prosecution . . . the only crimes admissible to attack veracity are such as affect credibility and refer to the conviction of a felony or misdemeanor in the nature of crimen falsi”.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We hold, in accordance with the preponderant view, that, whenever one who has been pardoned of a crime such as would ordinarily affect credibility, testifies as a defendant in a criminal case, the judgment of conviction may be inquired into, and the issuance of the pardon may also be shown.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““A full pardon releases the punishment and blots out the existence of guilt, so that, in the eyes of the law, the offender is as innocent as if he had never committed the offense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.