Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 Pa. Super. 429 - Commonwealth v. Hawkins

295 Pa. Super. 429 - Commonwealth v. Hawkins’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably 378 Pa. Super. 353 - Commonwealth v. Groff (1988), 320 Pa. Super. 533 - Commonwealth v. Middleton (1983)

58 state decisions

3201982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Blair · Commonwealth v. Allen · Wiegand v. Wiegand · Commonwealth v. Wable · Commonwealth v. Peterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) motive; (2) intent; (3) absence of mistake or accident; (4) a common scheme plan, or design embracing the commission of two or more crimes so related to each other that proof of one tends to prove the others; or (5) the identity of the person charged with the crime on trial. In other words, evidence of a prior criminal act is admissible where there is a logical connection between the prior criminal act and the crime currently on trial that proof of one naturally tends to show that the accused is the person who committed the other.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`[w]hen the evidence is relevant and important to one of these . . . [exceptions], it is generally conceded that the prejudicial effect may be outweighed by the probative value.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.