Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 SO2D 735 - Umphress v. State

Umphress v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2015

8 state decisions

2019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Westmoreland v. State · Kelly v. State · Young v. State · Lea v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In Kelly v. State, 204 Miss. 79 , 36 So.2d 925 (1948), we said: `Section 26 of the Constitution of 1890 secures to the accused such a specific description of the nature and cause of the accusation as will enable him to make preparation for his trial, and also such identification of the offense that he may be insured against a subsequent prosecution therefor.... ( 204 Miss. at 88-89 , 36 So.2d at 926 ).' More recently we defined the office of an indictment in Westmoreland v. State, 246 So.2d 487 (Miss. 1971), by stating: `An indictment, of course, constitutes the "pleading" in a criminal case. Its office is to apprise the defendant of the charge against him in fair and intelligible language (1) in order that he may be able to prepare his defense, and (2) the charge must be laid with sufficient particularity of detail that it may form the basis of a plea of former jeopardy in any subsequent proceedings.... ( 246 So.2d at 489 ).'" 295 So.2d at 736 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “There is no logical way [Umphress] could determine which of the charges arising on a particular day that he was being tried under.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.