Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

295 So. 2d 864

Hunt v. Howard

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1974

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1974-05-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1980

1 state decisions

Relies on Maggio v. Papa

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1974-05-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

WILLIAMS, Judge.

¶1Simon P. Smith died while a patient in Lincoln Park Nursing Home. Someone from the nursing home notified Hunt’s Golden State Funeral Parlor of Smith’s death. John T. Hunt, d/b/a Hunt’s Golden State Funeral Parlor took charge of the body for purposes of interment. This suit was brought by Hunt against deceased’s daughter, Irma Howard, for an alleged balance due of $314.60 in funeral expenses. Irma Howard filed an answer in the form of a general denial. After trial, the district court held for defendant, stating plaintiff failed to bear his burden of proof. From this judgment plaintiff perfected this appeal.

¶2The evidence disclosed the total funeral bill was $1,005 of which $250 was credited from burial insurance and $440.40 from the Railroad Retirement Board.

¶3Hunt testified Irma Howard chose the funeral arrangements for her father and agreed to pay any balance after the credits applied.

¶4Mrs. Leatrice Dunne Morrison, an employee of the funeral parlor, testified defendant came by a week or more after Smith’s interment- and stated she would pay the balance on her father’s funeral bill. There was no written agreement.

¶5Irma Howard denied making any arrangements for the type of funeral her fa*865ther had, and further, that Hunt advised her the burial insurance and Railroad Retirement Board payments would cover all funeral expenses.

¶6The funeral expenses are a debt of the estate of decedent, Simon P. Smith. Maggio v. Papa, 206 La. 38, 18 So.2d 645 (1944). The promise to pay the debt of a third party must be in writing. LSA-C.C. Art. 2278(3).

¶7The trial court found plaintiff failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Irma Howard agreed to become primarily responsible for the debt. The record supports this conclusion.

¶8The judgment of the trial court is affirmed and all costs cast on plaintiff-appellant.

¶9Affirmed.

/295/so2d/864 · .json · Public domain