Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

295 S.W.3d 183

Duran v. Andrew

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 2009

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2009-09-22

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2014

7 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-09-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Christopher Andrew (hereinafter, “Andrew”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entering a full order of protection against him pursuant to Section 455.040 RSMo (2000) 1 for abuse or stalking of Janeen M. Duran. Andrew raises one point on appeal, claiming there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate Andrew violated Section 455.010 et seq.

¶3 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

1

¶4 . All further references herein are to RSMo (2000).

/295/sw3d/183 · .json · Public domain