Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 S.W.3d 329 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth))

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. United States · Marin v. State · Reyna v. State · Ortiz v. State · Ex Parte Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] trial court may conditionally agree to follow a plea-bargain agreement, but only by delaying the unconditional acceptance or rejection of the agreement until after the condition of acceptance has been fulfilled.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[O]nly the state and the defendant may alter the terms of the agreement[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the court shall inform the defendant whether it will follow or reject such agreement in open court and before any finding on the plea. Should the court reject any such agreement, the defendant shall be permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty or nolo contendere.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.