Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 S.W.3d 458 - Thorpe v. Commonwealth

Thorpe v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Mills v. Commonwealth · Johnson v. Commonwealth · Chestnut v. Commonwealth · Funk v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence that 'appeals to the jury's sympathies, arouses its sense of horror, provokes its instinct to punish, or otherwise may cause a jury to base its decision on something other than the established propositions in the case' is unfairly prejudicial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.