Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

295 S.W.3d 909

State v. RULO

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 2009

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2009-11-03

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2021

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-11-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

¶2 Daniel Rulo appeals the circuit court’s judgment convicting him of tampering in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, and careless and imprudent driving. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that sufficient evidence exists to support Rulo’s convictions and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

¶3 Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

/295/sw3d/909 · .json · Public domain