Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 ARK 563 - Brazel v. State

Brazel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2025

11 state decisions

5019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Douglas v. Alabama · Lee v. Illinois · Parker v. Randolph · Cruz v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The mere fact some inquiry on voir dire may touch on instructions later to be given does not per se render such questions beyond the scope of voir dire.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.