Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 F.2d 153 - United States v. Beach

United States v. Beach’s Empirical Analysis

296 F.2d 153 · 1961

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
8
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably State v. Asherman (1984), Kiser v. Bryant Electric (1982)

30 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

1901961197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Campbell v. United States · United States v. Remington · Grace Corso v. Security-First National Bank of Los Angeles · Perry v. Bailey · United States v. Collins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a more critical examination of an exhibit.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Obviously where the perjury relates to the accused’s state of mind, such as what he knew or saw or heard, proof can only be made by proof of facts from which the jury will infer that the accused must have known or seen or heard what he had denied knowing or seeing or hearing.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the law is well settled that a case must be decided upon evidence submitted in court during the trial and not upon private experiments of the jurors”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.