Larson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
296 F.2d 167 · 1961
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 1999 · most notably Smith v. United States (1966), Moody v. Albemarle Paper Co. (1973)
25 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312
Relies on Langnes v. Green · Rosenberg v. United States · United States v. Mack · The Steamship Styria v. James L Morgan · Continental Casualty Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(2) Setting Aside. The court may direct that a forfeiture be set aside, upon such conditions as the court may impose, if it appears that justice does not require the enforcement of the forfeiture. * * * * * * “(4) Remission. After entry of such judgment, the court may remit it in whole or in part under the conditions applying to the setting aside of forfeiture in paragraph (2) of this subdivision.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“what is right and equitable under the circumstances and the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.