Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 F.2d 39 - Farrell v. Danielson

Farrell v. Danielson’s Empirical Analysis

296 F.2d 39 · 1961

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
January 1984
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1984

5 federal appellate ·

40196119701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Los Angeles Trust Deed & Mortgage Exchange v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Brumby Metals, Inc. v. Bargen · Los Angeles Trust Deed & Mortgage Exchange, Trust Deed & Mortgage Exchange, Trust Deed & Mortgage Markets, David Farrell, Oliver, J. Farrell, Roy A. Bonner, Thomas Wolfe, Jr. And Stanley C. Marks, v Securities and Exchange Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Every order granting an injunction and every restraining order shall set forth the reasons for its issuance; shall be specific in terms; shall describe in reasonable detail, . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.