Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

296 F.2d 595

Docket No. 16318.

Hepner v. Chozick

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Oct. 12, 1961. Decided Nov. 16, 1961.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1961-11-16

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1995

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

2 counsel of record

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“In an action to be tried without a jury the court shall accept the master's findings of fact unless clearly erroneous. Within 10 days after being served with notice of the filing of the report any party may serve written objections thereto upon the other parties. Application to the court for action upon the report and upon objections thereto shall be by motion and upon notice as prescribed in Rule 6(d). The court after hearing may adopt the report or may modify it or may reject it in whole or in part or may receive further evidence or may recommit it with instructions.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Betty L. Green v. Nicholas F. Brady, Secretary, Department of the Treasury

Relies on Dyker Bldg. Co. v. United States ex rel. Parreco · Michael Del Balso, Inc. v. Carozza

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1961-11-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Lawrence C. Moore, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Mr. John J. McBurney, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before Mr. Justice BURTON retired,1 and EDGERTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The appellee, executor of the estate of the late Elizabeth Geary Hepner, filed a complaint for an accounting against the appellant, a stepson of the deceased, to whom she had given a general power of attoeney. The District Court referred the action of the court's auditor 'with direction to audit and state said account, and to do any and all things required in this cause in accordance with rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Procedure.'

¶2

The term 'master' in the Rule includes an auditor. F.R.Civ.P. Rule 53(a), 28 U.S.C.A. Rule 53(b) provides that 'inactions to be tried without a jury, save in matters of account, a reference shall be made only upon a showing that some exceptional condition requires it.' Rule 53(e)(II) requires the court to 'accept the master's findings of fact unless clearly erroneous' and provides that the court 'after hearing may adopt the report or may modify it or may reject it in whole or in part or may receive further evidence or may recommit it with instructions.'

¶3

The auditor held hearings, took testimony, and filed a report in which he found that appellant was accountable for a balance of $5,399.99. The appellant filed objections to the report. 'After consideration of the Pleadings, the report, the record, the memoranda in support, of and in opposition to the Report, and the other papers on file in the case' the court, without receiving further evidence, approved the report and adopted the auditor's findings of fact and recommended judgment. We find no error or abuse of discretion. Cf. Michael Del Balso, Inc. v. Carozza, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 56, 136 F.2d 280; Dyker Bldg. Co., Inc. v. United States, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 297, 182 F.2d 85.

¶4

Affirmed.

1

Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 294(a)

/296/f2d/595 · .json · Public domain