Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

296 F.2d 737

Docket No. 6727.

Judd v. Cox

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1961-08-01

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1962

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1961-08-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas.

C. Robert Bard, Washington, D. C., and Homer Davis, Leavenworth, Kan., for appellant.

Major Frank O. House, Office of Judge Advocate General, Washington, D. C., and Newell A. George, U. S. Atty., Kansas City, Kan., and Benjamin E. Franklin, Asst. U. S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Affirmed without written opinion, on authority of U. S. v. Judd, 11 U.S.C.M.A. 164, 28 C.M.R. 388.

/296/f2d/737 · .json · Public domain