Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

296 F.2d 739

Docket No. 6818.

Martin v. Taylor

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1961-11-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1965

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Mort C. Lewis v. Carnation Company. Carnation Company v. Mort C. Lewis

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1961-11-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas.

David D. Gaumer, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Newell A. George, U.S. Atty., Kansas City, Kan., and Benjamin E. Franklin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., for appellee.

Before BRATTON, LEWIS and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Affirmed without written opinion, on the ground that the exclusive remedy to review the questions raised in this cause is by motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255.

/296/f2d/739 · .json · Public domain