Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 F.2d 74 - Pridgin v. Wilkinson

Pridgin v. Wilkinson’s Empirical Analysis

296 F.2d 74 · 1961

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
June 1989
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 1989

21 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

100196119701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on A. Maschmeijer v. Eastern Motor Express, Inc. · Smith v. Welch · Franklin v. Shelton · Ziegler v. Akin · St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Bell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may well have been a generating factor which culminated in a verdict not warranted under the law,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.