Manning v. Paradis’s Empirical Analysis
296 F.3d 1098 · 2002
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2023
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Gartside · Cooper v. Goldfarb · Fujikawa v. Wattanasin · Estee Lauder Inc. v. L'Oreal, S.A. · David M. Rapoport v. William C. Dement, Mark R. Rosekind, and Jeffrey L. Schwimmer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“are, regrettably, confusing. But the majority perpetuates the confusion in reaching its result. And its approach threatens to render superfluous a substantial body of law starting with the Supreme Court's seminal City of Elizabeth case. I discuss these two problems in turn. A To know whether and when the inventor determined that the invention would work for its intended purpose for reduction to practice, we must first know what the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.