Acevedo-Garca v. Vera-Monroig E’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
11 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2025
11 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hilton v. Braunskill · Weaver v. Henderson · Olympia Equipment Leasing Company v. Western Union Telegraph Company · United Steelworkers of America v. Textron, Inc. · Prudential Insurance Company of America and Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Bettie Boyd, Clarice D. Boyd as the Natural Mother and Guardian of Danita Boyd and Daniel Boyd, Iii, as Minors, Prudential Insurance Company of America and Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Bettie Boyd, Clarice D. Boyd as the Natural Mother and Guardian of Danita Boyd and Daniel Boyd, Iii, as Minors
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the applicant has made a strong showing of success on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably harmed absent [a stay]; (3) whether issuance of the stay will injure other parties; and (4) where the public interest lies.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“‘[t]he sine qua non [of the stay pending appeal standard] is whether the [mov-ants] are likely to succeed on the merits.’ Weaver v. Henderson, 984 F.2d 11, 12 (1st Cir.1993). In essence, the issuance of a stay depends on ‘whether the harm caused [movant] without the [stay], in light of the [movant’s] likelihood of eventual success on the merits, outweighs the harm the [stay] will cause [the non-moving party].’ United Steelworkers of America v. Textron, Inc., 836 F.2d 6, 7 (1st Cir.1987) (internal quotations omitted).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The sine qua non of the stay pending appeal standard is whether the movants are likely to succeed on the merits. In essence, the issuance of a stay depends on whether the harm caused movant without the stay, in light of the movant’s likelihood of eventual success on the merits, outweighs the harm the stay will cause the non-moving party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.