Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 F.3d 247 - United States v. Chase

United States v. Chase’s Empirical Analysis

296 F.3d 247 · 2002

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 2022
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2022

15 federal appellate ·

190200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3584 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Pinkerton v. United States · Bailey v. United States · Albernaz v. United States · Smith v. First Union National Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f stacking for grouped offenses were prohibited, then two defendants guilty of multiple crimes might receive roughly the same sentence even though one was subject to a higher guideline range as a result of more harmful conduct or a more egregious criminal history.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the point within the guideline range designated by the district court as the appropriate term of imprisonment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “as a purely logical matter, there is no obstacle to stacking a defendant's sentences for grouped offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.