Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 F.3d 58 - Aeid v. Bennett

Aeid v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

296 F.3d 58 · 2002

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 2013
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · Lockhart v. Fretwell · Sellan v. Kuhlman · United States v. Gordon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “counsel made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the `counsel' guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “when a state court fails to articulate the rationale underlying its rejection of a petitioner's claim, and when that rejection is on the merits, the federal court will focus its review on whether the state court's ultimate decision was an `unreasonable application' of clearly established Supreme Court precedent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “state courts summarily rejected [habeas petitioner's] ineffective assistance of counsel claim without explanation, we must focus on the ultimate decisions of those courts, rather than on the courts' reasoning”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.