ACT, Inc. v. Sylvan Learning Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
296 F.3d 657 · 2002
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2023
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2 (§ 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. · Aspen Skiing Company v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corporation · New Jersey Department of Corrections v. Nash · Delaware v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo viewing the record in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and giving the non-moving party the benefit of all reasonable inferences supported by the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.