Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 F.3d 680 - United States v. Diaz

United States v. Diaz’s Empirical Analysis

296 F.3d 680 · 2002

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

57 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Cotton · Glover v. Standard Federal Bank · United States of America v. Fabian Aguayo-Delgado · United States v. Price

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “prevents courts from imposing sentences greater than the statutory maximum based on such findings.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(c) If the sentence imposed on the count carrying the highest statutory maximum is adequate to achieve the total punishment, then the sentences on all counts shall run concurrently, except to the extent otherwise required by law. (d) If the sentence imposed on the count carrying the highest statutory maximum is less than the total punishment, then the sentence imposed on one or more of the other counts shall run consecutively, but only to the extent necessary to produce a combined sentence equal to the total punishment. In all other respects, sentences on all counts shall run concurrently, except to the extent otherwise required by law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If the sentencing range exceeds the statutory maximum, Apprendi requires that the defendant be sentenced to not more than the statutory maximum term of imprisonment instead of to the total punishment calculated under the guidelines.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.