Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 F.3d 799 - Lawson v. Washington

Lawson v. Washington’s Empirical Analysis

296 F.3d 799 · 2002

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2023

5 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

120200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 453 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison · Ansonia Board of Education v. Philbrook · Balint v. Carson City · Martha D. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “establish that it initiated good faith efforts to accommodate the employee's religious practices or that it could not reasonably accommodate the employee without undue hardship.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “threatened him with or subjected him to discriminatory treatment, including discharge, because of his inability to fulfill the job requirements.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.