Akopyan v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
296 F.3d 852 · 2002
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2020
8 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Shalala v. Schaefer · Melkonyan v. Sullivan · United States v. Mathews · Flores v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“essentially a determination that the agency erred in some respect in reaching a decision to deny benefits.” Id. A remand under sentence six, however,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“authorizes district courts to review administrative decisions in Social Security benefit cases.” Akopyan v. Barnhart, 296 F.3d 852, 854 (9th Cir.2002). Sentence four and sentence six of Section 405(g)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because this sentence four remand was a final judgment in the case, the time frame for Akopyan to file his petition for attorneys' fees began to run upon expiration of the 60 day appeal period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.