Dilley v. SuperValu, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
296 F.3d 958 · 2002
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably Barber v. Colorado, Department of Revenue (2009), Cummings v. General Motors Corp. (2004)
12 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981A
Relies on Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody · Carole Kolstad v. American Dental Association · US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett · White v. York International Corp. · Israel Alicea Rosado v. Ramon Garcia Santiago
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The store manager, who ultimately approved Amaro’s suspension, testified that he was familiar with the accommodation requirements of the ADA and its prohibition against discrimination and retaliation in the workplace. From this evidence, a reasonable jury could have concluded that Wal-Mart intentionally discriminated against Amaro in the face of a perceived risk that its action would violate federal law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“This stringent standard of review is further heightened under plain error review, which has been limited to errors which seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“if the evidence points but one way and is susceptible to no reasonable inferences which may support the opposing party's position.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.