Schrader v. Fred A. Ray, M.D., P.C.’s Empirical Analysis
296 F.3d 968 · 2002
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2026
10 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Darrone · Butler v. City of Prairie Village · McDonald v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare Polk Center · Niehaus v. Kansas Bar Ass'n · Powers v. MJB Acquisition Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In enacting the 1992 amendment of the Rehabilitation Act, Congress intended that the standard of “reasonable accommodations” that employers must make under the ADA would serve as the standard in actions alleging Rehabilitation Act violations in the employer-employee context.... What the amendment does not state is that the standards of the ADA are to be used to determine whether an employer is even subject to the Rehabilitation Act in the first instance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[n]o otherwise qualified individual with a disability ... shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he standards used to determine whether this section [of the Rehabilitation Act] has been violated... shall be the standards applied under title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act [the ADA].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.