Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

296 F. App'x 75

Lewis v. Fenty

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 10, 2008

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-09-10

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 2015

2 district ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on 534 F. Supp. 2d 20 - Lewis v. Government of the District of Columbia

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-09-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

¶2This appeal was considered on the rec-oi’d from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellants. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

¶3ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed January 22, 2008, 534 F.Supp.2d 20, be affirmed. The district court propei’ly dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because it is not a civil action arising under federal law, see 28 U.S.C. § 1331, or between citizens of different states with an amount in controversy of more than $75,000, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332; nor does the complaint allege any other basis for the district court’s jurisdiction.

¶4Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

/296/fappx/75 · .json · Public domain