Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

296 F. App'x 85

Taylor v. Sturgell

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 30, 2008

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-09-30

Relies on Taylor v. Sturgell

Decided 2008-09-30

¶1JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

¶2Upon consideration of the motion of appellant Brent Taylor to govern future proceedings and to remand the case with direction concerning discovery and issue preclusion; and the motion of appellee Robert A. Sturgell to govern future proceedings and to remand the case for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision and the notice of appellee Fairchild Corporation of joinder *86therein; and in light of the vacatur by the Supreme Court of this court’s June 22, 2007 judgment, it is

¶3ORDERED that appellant’s motion be denied. It is

¶4FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s motion be granted. It is

¶5FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this case be remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Taylor v. Sturgell, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2161, 171 L.Ed.2d 155 (2008).

¶6The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

/296/fappx/85 · .json · Public domain