Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 F. Supp. 2d 1021 - DirecTV, Inc. v. Bertram

296 F. Supp. 2d 1021 - DirecTV, Inc. v. Bertram’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
May 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2512 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 47 U.S.C. § 605

Relies on Russello v. United States · John Young/appellant v. City of St Charles Missouri David King · Schaller Telephone Company v. Golden Sky Systems Inc · Flowers v. Tandy Corp. · Midwestern Machinery, Inc. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the plain and unambiguous language of § 2520(a) limits those against whom a civil action lies to persons who intercept, disclose, or use electronic communications; that class of persons does not include manufacturers, assemblers, possessors, and sellers of satellite decryp-ters. As such, the Plaintiffs claim under § 2512(l)(b) of the Wiretap Act must be dismissed with prejudice. To recognize a cause of action in this instance would be tantamount to denying the language of § 2520(a) its ordinary meaning.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The private civil action is authorized not, as plaintiff has rephrased the statute in its brief, against a person who “engaged in any violation of chapter 119.” Instead, the statutory language itself authorizes a civil action against a person who “engaged in that violation.” As a matter of grammar and sentence structure, the phrase “that violation” must refer to the interception, disclosure, or intentional use of a communication in violation of this chapter referred to earlier in the sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.