Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 F. Supp. 2d 965 - Smith v. Duke

296 F. Supp. 2d 965 - Smith v. Duke’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
September 2007
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Heck v. Humphrey · Neitzke v. Williams · V. C O Churner · Snider v. Melindez · Rivera v. Allin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is mandatory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.