Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 Ga. App. 402 - State v. Alvin

296 Ga. App. 402 - State v. Alvin’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Stephens · Aldrich v. City of Lumber City · 232 Ga. App. 274 - Pailette v. State · 263 Ga. App. 755 - Campbell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Probable cause does not demand the certainty we associate with formal trials.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a magistrate must simply make a practical, common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the veracity and basis of knowledge of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place. And the duty of a reviewing court is simply to ensure that the magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed. On appeal, we give substantial deference to the magistrate's decision to issue the warrant, and we construe the evidence in favor of the court's decision that probable cause existed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the evidence of [Briscoe's] drug activity included [Briscoe's] actions of briefly going to his residence immediately before traveling to the location of the controlled buy. And, significantly, the evidence did not reflect that [Briscoe] made any additional stops or had contact with any other individual after leaving his residence and arriving at the controlled buy. Therefore, the evidence of [Briscoe's] actions and the circumstances presented authorized a finding that [Briscoe] may have stored the drug contraband at his residence and retrieved the drugs from that location before delivering them to the confidential informant at the controlled buy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.