Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 Ga. App. 898 - Escobar v. State

296 Ga. App. 898 - Escobar v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · McDougal v. State · 293 Ga. App. 633 - Brown v. State · Lebrun v. State · Cook v. Huff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An individual must be advised of his Miranda rights, including his right against self-incrimination, only after being taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way. A person is in custody for Miranda purposes if he has been formally arrested or restrained to the degree associated with a formal arrest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.