State v. Suter’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2021
most recently cited
2 district · 12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal · Webb v. Texas · 110 Wash. 2d 403 - State v. Kitchen · State v. Timley · State v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Count One, die defendant is charged with aggravated burglary. The defendant pleads not guilty. “To establish this charge, each of the following claims must be proved: “1. The defendant knowingly entered into or remained in a structure located at 3101 East Kansas Avenue, Garden City, Kansas, belonging to Wal-Mart. “2. The defendant did so without authority. “3. The defendant did so with the intent to commit a dieft therein. “4. At the time there were human beings in the Wal-Mart store. “5. This act occurred on the 26th day of March, 2011, in Finney County, Kansas.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Acevedo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.