State v. Galaviz’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

43 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Mickens reservation” because in a situation “where a 'conflict is rooted in counsel's obligations to former clients,'” the United States Supreme Court has”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Bowen · Daniel Chippewa v. State

2. “[t]he purpose of the effective assistance guarantee 'is simply to ensure that criminal defendants receive a fair trial.'”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Moyer · Khalil-Alsalaami v. State

3. ““The first category includes cases in which it is claimed that the attorney’s performance was so deficient that the defendant was denied a fair trial. The second category applies when the assistance of counsel was denied entirely or denied at a critical stage of the proceeding. The third category includes situations where the defendant’s attorney ‘actively represented conflicting interests.’ ” Galaviz, 296 Kan. at 181 (quoting Mickens v. Taylor, 535 U.S. 162, 166 , 122 S. Ct. 1237 , 152 L. Ed. 2d 291 , reh. denied 535 U.S. 1074 [2002]).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Sola-Morales v. State