Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 296 Ky. 82 - Benge v. Commonwealth

Benge v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 1972
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 1972

18 state decisions

801943195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chreste v. Commonwealth · Bradley v. Commonwealth · Chaney v. Commonwealth · Williams v. Commonwealth · Hannah v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under our practice the truthfulness of the facts stated in an affidavit filed in support of a motion to vacate cannot be questioned by the judge, but it must contain facts from which ‘it may be readily determined that the judge sought to be removed is so prejudiced against the litigant as to make it reasonably apparent that he cannot with his human nature give the affiant a fair and impartial trial.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * The trial court is vested with a sound discretion in determining the question where there is evidence both.in support and in resistance of the motion, and this court has uniformly held that it will not interfere with the trial court’s decision unless it appears with reasonable certainty that there has been an abuse of discretion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.